i usually never post in flame topics but this time i will do. if you think we're ally, why we're never goin aq / dragons / lilith / anakim / baium togheter as a whole alliance? maybe the correct answer is because we don't have any alliance from bs+rg right now. maybe we're focusing on common enemy sometimes in gainak or 4bosses, but that's an agreement made by those pt's there in those zones in that moment given. you can also see sometimes rg vs bs on gainak or krogel or turakan (well maybe your clan can't notice that but nvm) @logy: sorry to burst your bubble but we never had any agreement with bs for last siege in oren, we went 2 times and we broke some doors and we left that siege, but oren was not a priority for us (why i don't know, for that you have to ask shiny), you were fighting whole time bs vs ba, we went there few times to break doors and crystals and we left and ofc we didn't even moved in full force (from 190 ppl cc we went there with around 70), rest were either in rune or schuttgart if you need to think that bs+rg have ally togheter to kill ba, it's fine for me, but repeating same lie over and over again will not make it true, at least until now we have no alliance, but as i said, if you wanna be happy thinking on that, do it
let me laugh : hahahahaha. i'm done. maybe your cl hide the truth. but comming from two different side to crush the same opponent is called alliance. maybe there is no alliance for pve matter ( still there is for gainak/4 bosses) but in terms of pvp obviously there is something.
i know from very first hand what is it happening in my clan so no, he doesn't hide anything. btw if rg kills bs and bs kills rg in pvps for dragons and so on, how do you call it? masochist alliance?
agreement =/= alliance. if we don't pve togheter, if we pvp against bs when u'rent there, it isn't an allience.
your alliance is like sex friend for a couple. we aren't in couple but we have sex relationships. alliance is when some people from different side are making agreement for a common goal. and it's actually happening.
sorry for answering so late. if anybody comes with that idea i could say the same i put on my ally name: what about no. severance can be weaker than any of those clans, we may have not enough numbers to do something big, but what will never happen is severance doing an agreement to keep something we can't do alone so dont deserve to have it (talking about castles). we may not be the best, but that doesnt mean we gonna eat **** just to eat something. if we particullary took gludio castle from oath was to proof something to oath. like the most of the times we do anything at all.
hi guys, why are you trying to humiliate severance by suggesting they need protecting? they will fight and maybe they will lose. so what? next siege, another castle and that's that. or this is the version of events you are trying to avoid and by putting it on the forums you hope it will never come true? need i remind everyone that diplomacy is part of the game? it might be the case that 2 will gang up against a more formidable opponent, but that's how it was always from the beginning of time (sending people to history books), that's how it was for ba+rg (sending people to logy, the history teacher). there will be no protecting anyone; they don't need it and if i am to guess, we would like that stone as well as bs. if ba will manage to get it again, it will only prove what we already know: they are the best pvpers on the server and yes, they do have the best gear. for all the people that are saying rg tried to take oren or assisting bs in taking oren, we were there for the pvp, not the pvp stone. if you doubt my words, please do check vlllm's fraps ( loved it, well played) and ireflects fraps too. now count how many times you saw rg in there and how many bs; now, without replying on the forum, come to a conclusion and answer to yourself. ps: donors **** balls, i hate them.
random events tend to be random. when you have one clan obviously kiting another and at the point when they succeed kiting a third clan appear to break doors and make way for casters this it a likely suspect for proving a theory of coordination. when this event happens for the second and third time then the theory stops sounding like a theory, at this point you could call it a fact if your impartial in interpreting the results. now there's the rub for rg and bs. they try to pick only those situations in which it looks like such coordination doesn't exist. unfortunately such situations are so few and the opposite examples are so many that people like you, my dear friend, have to write a wall of text to try explain the facts in a way they aren't.
oh come on it's the same **** with ba. like they refused to call their 'agreement' with rg an ally, but were even fighting together at dragons against bs. so the table has turned and you can't stop qqing? get over it.
i don't think i or we qq about this. we just pointing out the truth you and rg trying to hide. i seriously don't care if you both hold hands or no, because no matter what your relation is, it means more war tags for me = more fun. simple.
as for me this rg+bs are same as rg+ba :d logical-illogical creacher created to get something. i bet rg are in same state to bs like they were to ba. why do you even ask ? .. everything going according to your plan!
tinary i bow to u , finaly someone from your clan speak more normaly , then just writing pages of storys isisn't that top pvp clan as ba say they are should care only for as much cw and as many clan's together fighting them , then repeating about bs+rg ... and i know l2 is about drama ,but this is geting bored ... p.s i would prefer ba vs rg vs bs vs severence vs laonda vs oath ,but tha won't happend soon
first of all as soon as rg and bs stop denying it, ba will stop saying it. ba welcomes the wars, but trying to spin propaganda saying it's three sided server is hurting the public image of ba, on the other hand, when people realize it's still two sided, just a 200 plus people clan switched sides, then every victory or defeat of ba is perceived in a quite different way. so quinter, reevaluate your statement and ask yourself, would there be any need for ba to speak the truth over and over again, to present evidences of it, if the leadership of bs and rg had limy's decency and come forward and announce their profound new love. of course not. then the zerg would be happy, the people who fight the zerg would also be happy, and the flame on forums wouldn't be over such trivial thing as the truth.
boring discussion about nothing, each clan does what is best for itself (or tries), bs wanted to take pvp stone for itself, rg didn't seem to care much about it, hardly saw many rgs but w/e, but i guess in their point of view it's still better that we take it than you, can be because they think you're strong enough, can be because they hate you, can be for whatever reason, but it's their reason. similar things can be said about other points, but i guess yep at this point you can be sure that if it will be profitable for both clans to ignore each other and focus on you, it will happen, think about it however you want if it helps you feel better, honestly the only way it bothers me is that this useless discussion on forum is taking place of other more interesting conversations...
syra, ronove, you call limy liar? ba had ally with rg, table is turned bs have ally with rg. get your collective facts straight ^^
