1 week ago, in the sieges thread some enclave reply me. "not, we are not friendly with ba/rg". cool story bro! is quite funny/sad that a side that had already more numbers than us for everything, decide to invite enclave... guess that nemesys masterplan to make enclave 3rd side too stronk. now i have a serious question, for ba and rg, specially for the greedy people of ba: few months ago, ba was trying to get more than the 50% of drops from rg... (ofcs, they didnt get it) now u invite enclave to ur ally, so now the drop will be the 33.3%, what changed lately in ba to accept this, when just 1-2 months ago u wanted a bigger piece from the cake? because i hope enclave are enough smart to ask/get the same as the others.
to be honest ... i'm sure the future will prove history. as ba member i have no problem with rg or enclave but i doubt this ally will stay forever. the history has proven the fact, that allies rarely work for long time, because soon someone will want more than he is getting now, soon someone will make drama because of something, not even saying about all those qq after pvp "why are we killing each other?" ... i would love to see all 3 clans make together, and i'm sure it will work for some times. but as i said, history has proven that some things just happend again and again. but let see, maybe i'm wrong. the best idea would be just make one clan, because it's much more easy in mass pvp and the fact we can kill each other is bad for us, not bs. but people will never do something like this, sadly.
honestly i should miss something, the greedy people of ba is quitting, they change of mind or something happened that i dont know. i dont think that some people, specially some, will accept this 1/3 drop stuff.
yeah it's curious how the drops will be shared between 3 clans, i didn't even think about it before ;p
1 year ago, people predicted that our "little alliance" with ba will end very soon, when the greedy blablalbalblabla. well here we are, amigos, 1 year later, to prove that you were wrong. keep predicting and keep telling us what will happen. how we will handle the drops, is our own business, but i will tell you the secret : i will take all the drops. @wine : bs always had more numbers than us, for everything. and they were not satisfied with their 180 online during siege and 50-70 from bsii, but they also had laonda/7sins under "orders" to come to rune, so they can focus on aden. now we have more numbers and it's "sad" ? yes it's very sad, i will go in the corner and cry.
i just remind you that i've no power to decide for enclave , what i think isn't excuses, it isn't also the reason that made enclave join ba/rg side. about those "excuses" , from what i saw , bs began to improve his side , and so in my honest opinion since enclave hasn't as many stacked party as ba/rg or bs , we couldn't build a 3rd side cause we were getting stomped by both side. and yes , at the last siege ba/rg were hitting us , that means we weren't friendly.
yyyyyy hi! i am blejd - still new here(back after about 1,5-2years) and... hmmm... can someone make a shortcut for this 191 pages? i love drama and epic rage, so it would be nice to give short info with pages of rage and drama scribed;3 pls and thank u for your time;d edit: letterbugsarescary
come on...you were crying for zerg back then we are crying for zerg now. what's the matter? :/ the ball is just switching hands.
blackswans?:bbb with polish i meant lilith and i think that all the people understood that since there was no point in the post being offensive. if you think that refeering to the people playing on polish server (with polish language .pl domain and so on) is racism, just lol.
you're both zergs who can't win unless you have more than three parties to turn the battlefield into a mess where melee classes can have a minor impact. you have over 5 parties, and you still don't split up, because strategy, by the looks of it, is an alien concept to you. you think keeping the high-ground is nonsense, and you have no idea what the term sandwich implies unless it's used in nutritional or sexual context. you think your aoe is good in pvp, while the truth is far removed from reality. you're at a point where you're squabbling over who's the best of the worst alliances, while you continue to recruit more (random) players to join your headless / strategically inferior blob, and you persist if only because of your own ignorance of the truth. /thread?