just asking, seems like it's the worst buffer now. ofc the active one, not buff and sit to the end of the world. does mana burn works over 85+? wondering if i will have to solo ...
always take a warcryer, for sheer insanity of buffing a pt with single target buffs. do pps get to transfer skills now, for access to vamp rage? also: anyone figured out what to do with the extra enchanter past lv85? lvl with dc + sd or swm for optimal performance (unless nuker o/c), then have them draw straws for who gets kicked at 85?
just go with se, ee/cardy and bd would be harder till 85 but if u get wc/ol/pp ull have 2 enchanters, which is odd, and playing without bd su cks
being a huge fan of prophets, i would probably but face it: ncsoft left prophets in the shadows for several chronicles, giving every single buffs to wc (and to a lesser extent to ol). also party wide buffs, combo buffs, higher damage output in pve, better mana regeneration mechanism... it doesn't make any sense to play a prophet nowadays.
active prophet can buff your party much better (not faster though) than wc/ol. everyone gets individual buffs and also elemental buffs depending on your enemy. still, most people would rather get halfassed, but quick buff than a real one. therefore prophet is declassed to archer buffbox or small parties (duo, trio) buffer.
we had a pp in our melee cp on our last server. worked out well. only the inital buff round makes you wait, the rebuffs you hardly notice. it was much harder to box pp if he wasn't online that it would have been with the wc. it's a very good class for pvp, cc, additional mana burn and root really shine. takes more effort tho.
and now wc have group elemental protection. everybody in the party has full buffs that take anyway less space than prophet ones. no really prophets have nothing more except the lvl 83 skill but you keep it only 2 levels anyway... for pvp however i can understand that prophet can be interesting with another rez, roots and mana burn.
we'd like to inform you that this topic is being closed, since it is inactive, and will be archived at the 1st of the month, as planned. regards .