Siege Discussions (No Inappropriate language)

siege is different than amc. so yes. we rocked you in the siege. you just lost. accept it and your life will be easier.

when we speak about sieges you must answer about sieges. like this , ba = homeless. and bs destroyed ba/rg rushes in aden throne room easily, fast and with thousands of crp.

ty going for work. cu later hater.

 

this topic is "siege discussion" not kamale/s3/gainak/gf pvp. change topic if you like to discuss your pvps at these spots

 

bs/bsii had 2 castles. rg/ba had 0 castle.
rg/ba have took 1 castle
bs/bsii lost 1 castle.

how can you say that you won??

 

rg/ba had 1 castle 1 week prior, they (ba) reset it on campaign to bet everything on taking aden, which they did but in the end couldn't keep it.

 

still that dosnt change that in this siege ba/rg won because from 0 castle they got 1. y they didnt took aden (maybe main goal was aden but not the only one)but they took one from your clan.

maybe bs/bsii you are satisfied with 1 castle because you are same clan but ba/rg are 2 seperated clans and both clans want a castle for them . im sure that they didnt bet everything to take aden

 

okay cool you won the siege and lost 4 campaigns in a row, all ok now?

uhhh no!!! campaign ain't siege sir! doesn't count!!! you cheating!

 

so fast that in 15 minutes bs got destroyed...15 minutes! yes they lost, but they did show you that you are not even 50% of what you speak of. gj having it back, but you know 120 +- against 170 isnt that fair . and please, look of other pvp's first than dare say your clan is the best.

this.

 

you keep the conversation up and i like but i want to add that at the moment 100% and without any excuses and turnovers both sides cant have both aden and rune without extraordinary tactic and much much much luck. both blackswansii and redguard cant keep castle at their own so its more of a who has better tactic, whos quickest and who is not slacking...
now, the profit from aden's dark castle makes the undeniable fact that aden its the most important castle. and since aden is the most important castle it means that the strongest clan has it.
so even if we could make the assumption that both bs and ba could take aden means that they are almost in similar strength. with that i want to conclude that when ba almost left aden unprotected to us, to retake it and have gone to rune to help rg keep the castle means that they couldnt handle bs or made a very bad choice by trying to have both castles so lost the most important. so if according to you, bs are not so good like ba why you didnt succesfully protect aden so we couldnt take it back? plus the fact that on this siege you had the upper hand of not taking friendly/ally damage, meaning you were a solid force.
the previous siege unfortunately i missed it and i was really surprised to learn that we succesfully had both aden and rune castles. so in my eyes atm still bs/bsii side a bit better than ba/rg
but thats from my point of view

 

it's simple. bs still have online advantage than ba. ba couldnt let rg alone so sended some forces to help get rune, thats theyer mistake. bs would never go rune to help bs2 bcuz they really wont let aden go and thats a fact, since bs2 is homeless and rg have theyer castle. ba lost aden bcuz of this, they wouldnt let rg homeless. and thats why lost aden.
but if you put bs+bs2 in field agaisnt ba+rg, ba+rg is better and when even numbers or even "some"(yes when had ba 4x8 bs still lost, but 110/120x170 is another story ) more, bs cant handle ba, if you check bugaimer frapses.

 

atleast bsii got cloacks for oly

 

hi guys, how is the siegue going?

 

gf, very good siege.....

 

had to do this :dd

 

we fall to rise.

nice siege and very good job from you.

 

no but this silence is gold

 

we had equal silences in the past by you.

 

well, bs wanted clan vs clan. they got what they wanted.

 

lempartus after siege ends:

 

no, not really, we aint that silent

 

gz ba with aden.