1. Discord Support team Facebook l2central.info

Core Daily discussion - clans, pvp and stuff

Discussion in 'Archive 2.0' started by Gilby, Apr 1, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mitsubishi

    mitsubishi User

    Joined:
    27.02.12
    Messages:
    815
    Likes Received:
    241
    if anything it would be the opposite, that ba took both drop, it would bs said that gm helps so of course now can deny and probably would do so, but it's true. the injured side will always be looking for some explanation, because it is unfair and that's it.
     
  2. Ronove

    Ronove User

    Joined:
    07.12.11
    Messages:
    863
    Likes Received:
    301
    there's more than 1 injured side. if we got loot on both bosses it probably means we clicked to enter first on both bosses, so ba/rg shouldn't have been there in first place. it's very easy to tunnel vision only on what you want to see though, i agree...
     
  3. Elesmira

    Elesmira User

    Joined:
    05.05.13
    Messages:
    2,595
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    yes i agree but the fact that most of ba+rg are trashing around about gms being in favor of blackswans is advanced stupid. most of your people are coming here after some tech bugs grasping the opportunity to flame even more...yes i understand you are angry, yes it might be unfair in both dragon situations, but really why there are so few of you that can actually do something constructive than just flame? why so few can post something like this ? why so many people lack maturity here?

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 9, 2014
  4. mitsubishi

    mitsubishi User

    Joined:
    27.02.12
    Messages:
    815
    Likes Received:
    241
    "point of view depends on the point of the seat."
     
    Empristis likes this.
  5. Elesmira

    Elesmira User

    Joined:
    05.05.13
    Messages:
    2,595
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    yup but also on your will to turn your head around.
     
    Empristis likes this.
  6. ERiPwn

    ERiPwn User

    Joined:
    05.01.12
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    162
    you do realize that u on first boss enter with less than half cc and took looting rights , and last night valakas the mighty game mechanics are broken again . its simple , last explanation from gm was that u enter 0.02 sec early than other cc , than how its possible that now 2 x 170 member cc's enter inside , both of them get looting rights and ends up that the loot itself was *general loot* . thats why we need a competent person to clarify it . but seems we wont find the proper guy that easy

    finishing with neck problem ! thats why the seat matter . some need to stay straight and watch it clearly and undisturbed , and some others have to suffer and watch the same thing by getting pain
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 9, 2014
  7. Ronove

    Ronove User

    Joined:
    07.12.11
    Messages:
    863
    Likes Received:
    301
    as i said, there's more than 1 'injured' side, we click first and not even everyone gets ported. thanks mate ^^
     
  8. AquaMarine

    AquaMarine User

    Joined:
    05.02.12
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    317
    he meant that its strange if accordnig to gms bs clicked 1st -there cc wasnt all inside -but ba/rg all.
     
  9. Ronove

    Ronove User

    Joined:
    07.12.11
    Messages:
    863
    Likes Received:
    301
    in normal conditions, if instance is full, no one gets ported, not half, not one person, not two person, not 2 parties, no one! so obviously we clicked on time and even gm confirmed we clicked first...
     
  10. Elesmira

    Elesmira User

    Joined:
    05.05.13
    Messages:
    2,595
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    i already asked pazak on pm to come here and have a look of what happened and enlighten us again. and about the blank thing, the truth is you want to find a gm who will will favor you that easy, because this is what you want. last time he explained what happened quite well and you still kept saying things about it. it might was not nice to happen but it did, you cant help it.

    here is what he said before .

     
  11. AquaMarine

    AquaMarine User

    Joined:
    05.02.12
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    317
    @ ronove
    yes yes /we know it -and yet ba/rg who as u and gms says clicked after -was all inside....
     
  12. Elesmira

    Elesmira User

    Joined:
    05.05.13
    Messages:
    2,595
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    what if bs clicked indeed 1st but during the small time requiring for the cc to port inside somehow was interrupted by your cc clicking just a bit later? so bs cc porting was bugged?
     
  13. Ronove

    Ronove User

    Joined:
    07.12.11
    Messages:
    863
    Likes Received:
    301
    my point was that none of you should have been inside since we clicked first. so the bug wasn't against ba/rg but against us. :d
     
  14. AquaMarine

    AquaMarine User

    Joined:
    05.02.12
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    317
    @ elesmira
    so there was a bugg in instance bugg? :)
    if instance where bugged -drop should be deleted and instance reset -it wold be normal and polite - and i dont care if bs or ba/rg taked drops in 1st place/bugged instance-no loot.

    comon ppl -if there is well known bugg -as even gms says -why no reset instance and deleting loot?
    i think its logical ? yes/no?!
    and its happen again...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 9, 2014
    mitsubishi likes this.
  15. Ronove

    Ronove User

    Joined:
    07.12.11
    Messages:
    863
    Likes Received:
    301
    in soccer there's an idea that referee don't call 'foul' if it favors the offending team... the people that got loot priority (aka the people who clicked to enter first), got the drops... why would they penalize them when in normal conditions they would be the ones killing+getting drops in first place?
     
  16. AquaMarine

    AquaMarine User

    Joined:
    05.02.12
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    317
    so why we cant hit aq with 99 characters if we wont ?
    cos server lagging and not cast para ? or why ur clan using high lvl long range atakers to kill orfen minions -cos they have closer range to cast para on them ?
    or amethyst making aoe in spawns spot orfen to get 1st hit in anakim?
    its all depends ....
    and if instance where bugged - its should be reset and or items deleted.
     
  17. ERiPwn

    ERiPwn User

    Joined:
    05.01.12
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    162
    so lets wait for them , the chosen guys who get payed to provide information to community and see what will happen .
    as u can read on statement made from pazak it says that *who enter first get looting rights* , yes some enlightenment
    would be great . couse we have random korean general loot this time ..
     
  18. Elesmira

    Elesmira User

    Joined:
    05.05.13
    Messages:
    2,595
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    even if this is fair somehow the game itself is not reverseable. like you cannot save-load the game. if something is actually dropped in a raid or a weapon breaks during enchanting it is over. just imagine if a dragon weapon fragment was dropped in 1 of these dragons. the game itself is a betting game. a luck based game. that's one of the things that makes it addictive. moreover not the whole raiding was bugged. the main part of the thing (killing the beast) in both cases was executed normally. still if it was a gm decision to actually delete the drops and reset the instance would have been again unfair for the time spent inside killing it.

    oh you little angels, of course you did not do any of these things.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2014
  19. AquaMarine

    AquaMarine User

    Joined:
    05.02.12
    Messages:
    1,271
    Likes Received:
    317
    dont turn my words up side/down plx.
    i'm w/8 for official respond from gms here...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2014
  20. Elesmira

    Elesmira User

    Joined:
    05.05.13
    Messages:
    2,595
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    i will because the argument you are creating is invalid. you are not the only one waiting for respond from gms.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.