@Palkah Issue is not in the fact you used fractions, it's in: use of the fractions to determine what succeeded and what failed AND stoping compounding on whole number constant Strictly speaking, it was not a whole number but you get the point. For instance, if you are left with 1.9, you will skip it thus creating an error. Same as you can compound 2.8, you can also compound 1.9. If I had more interest and time I might have attempted to write a formal proof for my claims but.. p.s. when/if you come to the same realization, feel free to mention me in the credits for that calculator
Thanks, I get what you mean, the changes are modifying the results a bit. They don't change the results' order though, still a tone of boxes required for anything.
yeah like trying to emulate lucky on computador isnt a big case of computer science. the guy that said is korean random is right, thats why rngesus exist, cos till today its well know that we cant emulate these kind of events.
