Our own private Dimensional Sieges

you can change only 1 thing , dont say what castle and will be more funny for all :d

 

well is good for adding stones . but u lost the point of top clans will get easy with 3 cps any castle of low clans . so the 2 stones of the month that u add will go always to bs/rg/ba
even all rest clan be 1 they cant win againts them . i miss old staff of this server

 

why should an end game item go to a low tier clan?

 

seems will be some fun for owners of that "choosing" castle :d

dont know, for more fun i would add rule like clan who gets that castle must to be active with some numbers ppl and lvls or we will see pvp to let box clan cast castle. want pvp stone, move from aden/rune to dion/gludio/other and get it

 

"on topic: we want to observe the process, draw conclusions and make modifications if necessary. it is not easy to make game process changes your feedback is warmly welcomed, but our homemade dimensional sieges will start the way they are designed now."

translation: i understand what you are saying, but i just don't give a ****!

 

i think it should work like this to make it more fair.
aden/giran/rune (mammon towns) if occupied by the same owner get 10 pvp armor stones for holding 1 week. 20 pvp armor stones for holding 2nd siege in a row. 1 pvp weapon stones and 20 pvp armor stones for 3rd seige. ever successful seige following reward will be given as the highest reward.

oren/dion/heine/goddard/gludio/schuttgart (non mammon towns) if occupied by the same owner get 5 pvp armor stones on the first seige, 10 the second siege, and 1 pvp weapon stone and 5 armor stones on the 3rd siege.

it will be a progressive reward system with increased difficulty and will still limit the amount of pvp weapon stones to 53 a year but only if castles are held by the same people for a year straight. in order to receive award castle owner must not have let someone else finish casting. i.e. clan 1 has castle, clan 2 takes castle, clan 1 takes back castle. siege ends, rewards will be reset to week 1 rewards. in order to receive rewards castles must be signed as dark castle.
i think this will make it fun and challenging, it will encourage bigger clans to fight against each other to prevent them from getting pvp stones, while still allowing not top pvp clans to have fun at the smaller castles while still getting decent rewards.


if you intend on going forward with the way you plan please do not announce the castle before the sieges.

announce it after. not only would it be funny but i think it would be more fair.

 

+1 to this!! best idea ever

 

i don't know why people are trying to give their solution, they said they won't change it before they see their "dimensional siege" once.

btw your solution nadmaster101 is the best way to make big clans take everything and share between those big clans.

 

http://www.lineage2.com/en/game/patch-notes/valiance/dimensional-siege/dimensional-siege.php

make smthing like this, gl keeping castles for 3 weeks on bot clans, to any of top clan... and this one castle pvp stone is a big joke. server will crash and poor guyz with small castles will cry... when 500+ comes to crest...

 

what the point to add one more end game item in game at all? so top will get abit more pixels and rest will left even more behind? so guys like ba will have more options to "show ballz" and talking about 30s material?
my point is that there is almost zero drops in all kind of instances/bosses. only that what top clans are farming & gms are adding a new thing for them. zero logic.

 

true, it's just their way to keep the players that have everything , give something else to farm to get money and to prepare themselves to dragon weaps, etc etc.

 

i would not even talk about that :d

 

why do randoms even care about pvp stones lol
its not like pvp option works on mobs

also great idea to make all server fight in one place lol,what can possibly go wrong right guys ?



guys ?

 

to make it more fun you should make rune without owner for next siege and let the storm come! ^^

 

they should wipe all castle owners.

 

dear users,

stay on topic or use the appropriate thread.

 

for me , it's not respectable to do that share thing. i hope some people gonna rise into both clans against this idea.

and i agree on the fact they should change the "dimensional siege"

p.s : don't begin to bother about the fact that ba and rg made alliance for a long time. i was in bs2 then in enclave. the alliance between the two clans wasn't long after i entered ba.

 

i liked the idea of a "pvp" server where everyone had same opportunity in terms of equip, with that you could also use a different server so that u avoid lags etc,
with that u could also give smaller reward to few castles and complicate a bit the game.

 

about the event: #servidordead #nopvponlypr #exptoomuchimportant #lvl100wannabe

 

i think theres only one solution of that idea. they should put stones to randomly castle without telling earlier what castle has win lottery. but it still make dead servidor.