Our own little dimensional siege feedback

hello,

i would like to give some feedback regarding this feature.

the whole idea is nice, finally there is some reward for keeping the castle. the problem is it's another feature for top 3 clans. it is known which castle will get stone and it complicates whole siege because everyone knows that for example this week (oren) will be taken by box of one of these clans: black swans, black angel, red guard.

i doubt they ignore item which is worth around 20kkk - 30kkk adena atm.

how the current defenders, death clan, can manage to defend this castle? who can resist a man-power of 200-300 people on siege? only the 3 clans mentioned above.

how about moving the winner (choosing a castle) after siege? because as there are 9 castles to conquer, after 4-5 sieges it is still possible to know which castle may get it so the whole siege will take place on few different places and middle clans will be able to defend/participate and not just one castle.

is it possible to consider it or the way it is distributed will stay as it is now?

regards

 

saying the winner after the siege will lead to box clans of those 3 top clans will take all castle. both clan will try to take 3 castle and so they will have 1/3 chance to get the stone. i think this has to be reworked indeed but giving the winning castle isn't the way to rework it imho.

 

since when it is possible to take all castles with box clans? ba rg bs is also busy with theirselves

 

if you cant defend castle you dont deserve for it. recruit more ppl. if you want to be small clan dont hope for castle.

 

all this dementional sieges are ****. feeding top clans/ demotivating rest. but as i see here gm's are just making smth w/o even a word b4 they probably think that they are smarter then ncsoft. its all pointless niewolnica, they are listening only to themselves.
@vivala.
teach us how to recruit.

 

still this idea is the best imho.

 

i believe nova casted all castles on chronos with boxes . also do you seriously suggest bs and rg won't make the ally official as soon as such system goes up. they'll go cast most castles while ba will cast the rest and probably occasionally clash on some siegefield but only when their business is secure.

 

i actually think that all the rest clans witch are not rg/bs/ba dosn't need that stone. it is more for the 'top' clans so it will benefit more our pvps and in those small clans i doubt you have that.

and it is like in the ncwest non of the small clans are able to get it, so it is better to keep it like that.

 

jeez, dat ego. already decided who need and what. gratz.

 

well... ofc since you own a smaller clan you ''need it''. buut, we all got diff opinion. i just think it wont change anything if you will have it.

 

pr faster with pvp weapon :d

 

imo the "dimensionnal" siege as it currently is is still better than the one you propose (still, i'm happy that you ask us our opinion on the subject). the server isn't only composed with 3 clans, but i think that those 3 clans will be the ones fighting for this stone. making the stone random after siege will simply deny all other clans to have the chance of having a castle, simply because top clans will send 1-2 parties to secure the castle, and in the end, it'll be :
-the 3 top clans that will have the stone anyway
-the 3 top clans will have every castle
because whatever you can say, most clans can be crushed in their whole by 2-3 top cps. so they have their business indeed, but if you allow the randomness, it'll be soon an "avoid-the-fight-between-us-to-have-the-maximum-of-castle"

so, to conclude, i think that the current version is better.

 

i agree with niewolnica that current system is not perfect, but your suggestion is even worst as all people before me said.
it is normal that pvp weapon stone will go to one of the 3 top clans, because theses are the ones that are strongest. the problem remaining with this siege is that low/mid clans lose one castle to play with.

- without system, low/mid clans can have fun and fight hard for 7 castles : dion-gludio-giran-heine-goddard-oren-schuttgart. aden and rune are locked by theses "top clans".
- with system, low/mid clans can have fun only in 6 castles. and the clan that, no luck for him, control the castle choosen will have a terrible siege, because registered as defenders, the only possibility for this clan is to fight somewhere else being non-registered to help some friends/allys somewhere else.

like the others i don't have the perfect solution, but i highly think that a system giving the stone for owner of aden/rune if they keep it like 2 sieges in a row would be best solution.

=> top clans will still have the stone, and they deserve it the most.
=> top clans will fight hard for it, so pvp will stay
=> low/mid clans will keep their 7 castle playground
=> low/mid clans won't randomly lose castle+have a terrible siege if their castle is choosed.

 

with this system i can already tell you that each side will just secure 3 castle and thats it. even split by 1/3 others clan have no chances against any of the current side.

one solution could be to keep current system and give pvp armor stones to the other castle.
another could be the just have a core-only dimentional siege for just 2 castles (say aden and giran) where every clan with any castle can join. this way lower clans can fight for giran while top clans fight for aden.

 

pvp stone weapon/rest pvp armor's +1.
about top clans and so on. if midd clans will play smart and stop asking for food like dogs from a top those 2-3 cps of "chosen" will kiss the ground and press to village. the problem is that "midd" clans are fine with what they have just "dont disturb" our little playground. also keep in your mind that thise 3 clans are not allied.

 

i prefer this solution as clans will be splitted onto different battlefield not focusing only one.
this would be more interesting. forces spread all over battlefields

 

i still preffer that solution of real ds. dim server with let say 2 castles or only one with pvp stone. make only castle owners be able participate with 70 members max, let them pvp for those two castles.

 

random feedbacks from my clan, basing on reading the rules and cry in game + forum:

- why not move this to devastated castle siege or some other fighting event?
- (if we stay with castles) we should know who gets the gems after the siege not before.
- boxclan re-sealing is abusing mechanics and it's against fair play rules. (if we will know after the siege who gets the gems) you don't have boxclans in dimensional sieges.


if you will not change it, most powerfull clan now will be more and more powerfull... if a random clan would receive those stones it would be a lot of adena for them so they can get plvl, gear, and other stuff.

 

i'm sorry but in no scenario random clans should be able to get pvp weapon stone.

 

randoms would care less if pvp armor stone will be farmable in some other way or something anyway. or atleast any kind of farm will be possible.