Game/Server/Events

of course u can. simplyy ppl will try reach goal always. if they will implement it to all castles, even u will have 500 u will not loose your castle where u already have 2/5 of pvp stone and none will risk to not have pvp stones, so... thats how game works...

 

how predictable, one of the 'leaders' of the clan owning aden castle saying to give rewards only to aden (or or, allied castle rune)... when in dimensional sieges they give to all castle anyway. get real, if they put like dim siege, aden/rune will already have the best rewards (only castles to get weapon stones), you want them to be the only rewards... talk about greedy.

 

i believe if logy would be a member of clan which is holding some other castle then aden/rune, he would be crying here - "no no no, don't make that rewards that would go only to aden/ rune, please, make rewards to all castles, qqqqq"

such obvious, very lol,

p.s. found picture of logy:

http://cdn.akamai.steamstatic.com/s...911cdf3221d0db14d8fb6219db613147f1e2_full.jpg

 

if i'm not wrong only owners of aden / rune was able to participate to dimensional sieges. not all clans that own a castle.

 

from last chronicle, every clan owning any castle can go to dimensional siege with 70 players. on this chronicle they changed it again so every clan even w/o castle can go to dimensional sieges, but on l2.ru they didn't made that change.

about rewards well, probably they will add dimensional sieges rewards into normal castles, so probably all castles will get rewards, but not the same ones ofc, probably only aden / rune will be able to get pvp weapon stones and all the rest pvp armor stones, just like on dim siege

 

thanks for the extra infos. will see what innova plans for us about that. principal problem would be turtle mode as logy said.

 

point is, its not decided yet. thats why, i guess, we should tell our opinions and maybe they will read it.

this is answer from gm of this answer about opinions how to implement pvp stones to game.

so now its most likely about "details".

pvp stones only to top castles, in my opinion, otherwise pvp will be even more dead and last pure pvp event will become pure mockery.

and btw: yes we have aden castle now, but this will change 1 day, so even for me should be better to have easier pvp stones, or pvp stones from boxed castles. but as i told u, it will kill pvp. so please what greedy?, at current situation our side should make like 3,4 pvp stones, if there should be pvp stones from all castles.
but mass pvps like we had previously for aden will not happen anymore...

 

there was event going on pts. card event. i guess we will get it sooner or later.

 

you want all those big epic pvps for aden: they will still happen, when there is one side that is big enough to challenge the defending side, because believe me, getting 2-3-4-5 weapon pvp stones is huge deal for any clan. in current state though, your suggestion is just ridiculous, the strong keep getting stronger, and the disadvantage keeps growing. at least when other castles also get pvp stones, they can still put some pvp armors, that's the difference compared to what you suggest. you expect me to take it serious when you suggest only your clan gets pvp stones from siege and keeps getting stronger and more and more unlikely to lose it?

to me the idea sounds terrible in first place, but yours is even worse.

 

sorry, my mistake... of course when i was speaking about pvp stones i meant pvp weapon stones.

honestly who cares about armor stones? :d

and i still think, if they will give pvp weapon stones to all castles, pvps like we had before will never happen anymore.

 

stop talk about pvp as you are only one who trying to kill mass pvp by adding as much clans to ally as you can.

 

40 ppl from enclave are "big" zerg added to our side. please take laonda or czechhorde and done.

our side is and was acting different. your side is canibalizing allies clans and dismissing less active members. as u can see we never merged rg and ba and we keep our daily activity at approximately 100 members. last siege u had 150 online, what is most from all top clans.
i dont wanna learn u how to play this game, but maybe this is reason why from overall and long time period is your clan considered as clan of loosers.

 

nice way to put it, completely ignoring the fact you had already double numbers of any other alliance out there before you added enclave. that was the point, you weren't even close to equal numbers with anyone else.

 

stop this zerg sh it seriosly. before ba's side went zerg bs had them all. so totally pointless to discuss zerg issues. take more people then, offer them stuffs or so.

 

logy, why can't you understand one simple thing. when all castles will be getting stones, the pvp will be more balanced, if they would add it only for aden/rune, the disbalance would be bigger and bigger, and there would be no pvp at all!

 

sure, if they add pvp stones, you will sacrifice 7sins and take all possible to defend innadril.

logy has right.

they shoudnt add pvp stones at all.

 

too late for not adding them at all, they should think about it before they put this **** in l2 store

 

if they will implement it today, i can tell u we will go take 6 castles and we will not even touch u at innadril. if u will leave innadril, only tham we will attack u with top parties. so u will changing castles every 2nd week and it will give u 0 stones or u will just defend castle mainly and attack with some small numbers. overall effect will be as i said, no proper mass pvp only some small mess in box clan castles. final effect after few period... ba/rg/enc with 5,6 pvp stones, bs with 1. both sides dissapointed from lack of pvp.

as u can see, on aq what we did, we did with some vision. if u continue to be lets say normal, we will bug loots all the time u can see aq on activity screenshots via rg forums fake spy account.

also imagine in this situation, gm team will cancel aq <49 restriction, both sides will follow vision and we will start make 1st hits with 99 chars. for it u need to take best spot and there will be mass pvp for it.
so i guess, visions are good. pvp stones in game are missing, but lets speak about how to implement it in most competitive way to not decrease quality of pvp in this game.

 

i completely don't understand your point, you think if they add pvp stone only to aden we will come for aden? can you tell me for what? till we don't find clan to ally which have 150 active ppl for siege and till we dont have equal numbers there is completely no point to even try take aden, because we simply have no chance... the only think what we can do with our 150ppl is to try to defend our lol castle.

we are trying to get ppl to 7s to make them stronger for a long time but it's not so easy.

 

although i agree with what you've said i must say that i think we are left out of innova's goals, which is disturbing :c

for such a small community as ourselves innova should be regularly discussing things with community members and work hard on improving the image they've managed to lose overtime.