Our own private Dimensional Sieges

giving stones to all castles wont give so many chances to weaker clans anyway since 90% of ppl are greedy, it will make top clans to take small castles with boxes... get real.

also, i don't see the problem to do it with box or main clan. i guess there will still be pvp with main chars to take area control.

anyway ppl were crying that there is no way to get stones (except event) now there is, but still complaining... human is never happy :/

 

http://www.lineage2.com/en/news/announcements/dimensional-siege.php
who is greedy?

 

all servers where by all we have 3.5 dead servers with 20 people clans. all pvp stones go to the majority of naia clans.

 

like they can get all with 3 side server.

cause even with this, u will need years to get near ru or ncwest servers ...

 

btw they can add feature in castle npc. to exchange blood alliance or smth. that item what you get after each siege. 2 items = 1 pvp weap stone/1 item 5-10 armor stones. easy. to get one (blood alliance) you need take castle, and in next siege protect. but this is probably too hard

 

that's the problem of creating retarted system. but still each clan on l2ru have very low chance to get stone. here we will have just distribution of pvp stones into a pockets of 3 guys/clans & and total zero motivation for the rest. not gona argue with people about "lower clans have no chance to grow". but i just want to see faces of all those clan leaders of "second league" who gonna read this beautiful "event".

 

why not do like russians? suggest few options, make open poll for whole server and that's all

 

weapon stone to aden and rune and armor stone to normal castle.

or this will end in a nonsense sieges with people playing in alt chars in another clan to get a castle like gludio because are the "choosen" one, is a nonsense.

i hope that innova staff reconsiderate it and change it, even if i know they dont care about their community feedback.

 

i see this completely in a different way. but i won't talk about this here , because it's not your business. i just disagree with most of you. giving stone to aden and rune would be too easy.

 

yes. stones in l2store give more profit

 

i have no clue how dim siege are supposed to work but..

the best solution imo would be to put 2 castle on dim siege "instance" : 1 low grade (armor stone), one high-grade (weapon). this way you can have 2 different level of competition : let the big clans fight for the weapon and allow the lower clans compete between them.

 

whoa, guys, i think you are confusing this thread with the wedding bells one :d

on topic: we want to observe the process, draw conclusions and make modifications if necessary. it is not easy to make game process changes your feedback is warmly welcomed, but our homemade dimensional sieges will start the way they are designed now.

 

good to see that you read our thoughts. it would be nice for some modifications to be done before launching it but oh well. i hope when madness starts to happen you will do what is needed.
ps. wine is waiting at kartia npc for you.

 

nice reading, thats obvious bs and rg will now qq about give it to 2 castles, so they can continue their ally and farm in peace.
i hope this will not happen, ill tell it straight its not good for clan who play alone vs 350ppl . so ill vote for no, for sure. for sure elronia and defro will vote for yes, so they can continue their ally and share pvp stones.

system like gm team presented is good. u can listen here to ppl from zerg side how they care about lowbies etc, give stones to lowbies. lets be honest, lowbies will not even try to go for it, because top clans will take lowbies castles with boxes.

simply if top clan will see pvp stone worth 30b is defended by 30 seconds material clan like severance, it will be very fast process

so more castles u will give reward, more rewards top clans will take. they will just secure some of castles, to have smth and they will fight for another castles to get more. thats how game work.

simply low clans will be screwed no matter what. this game isnt designed for low and small clans.
if u wanna make it equal for everyone, put it as reward from some agathion and this agathion will be for free. if it will be pvp oriented, small clans simply dont have chance...

 

awesome staff, reading our feedbacks and taking care of us! u will have our feedback and more things if u want!

 

in my eyes this will change the current priority of siege on our server,

1. before innova idea, top clans aimed for aden,rune cause of tax adena income.

2. after innova idea, top clans will focus on your selected castle in result of "smaller" clan will lose their castle.

 

boom! let the masacre begin! very bad idea about this siege. all server wil be in 1 castle. i wonder how many ppl will be able to move at that castle. its good to add pvp stones but maybe with other way.

 

you want to make it equal to everybody?
make it in pbe server or ken rahuel or something like, give all the gear needed at that server and make siege there in the sunday in between sieges in core.
this way, ppl without gear in core will be able to have same chances, or at least be able to win by skills and not lose by gear.
also, this way, lower clans won't lose their castle to a box cause of this siege.
anyway, ppl will qq cause they don't have gear advantage that they got from l2 store nor from farming on core, and they have a point on it, but come on, show your skillz.

 

i cannot think of any fair way to add this dimensional sieges, but for sure the idea you came up with is one of the worst possible.
if people already lag so much (internet and/or fps wise) in any mass pvp, do you really want to make whole server to fight for 1 castle which can be as small as gludio/dion/giran/heine/oren? i can already imagine the angel cat buff compensation for the server dcs.

 

give 1 pvp stone to the clan who take the designated castle like gm said can be a good idea i think.
it means mass pvp, all clans vs clan can be fun.
chance for smaller clans to take the stone with some ninja cast while others pvp.
2 pvp stones/month is a good ratio so not all server get pvp weapon after some time.

you can't give same reward as ncwest since there are 4-5 servers and we have only 1 here. no matter if naia take all, there are still 5.
like troy said, if server won't get dc, +1 for that idea.