1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Discord Support team Facebook l2central.info

Brooch stones for Yul

Discussion in 'Archive 2.0' started by zaza91, Jul 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. zaza91

    zaza91 User

    Joined:
    18.06.16
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would like to ask about the most appropriate setting stones in 4 slots brooch for Yul
     
  2. SnoWyz

    SnoWyz User

    Joined:
    14.09.13
    Messages:
    3,829
    Likes Received:
    463
    Ruby opal diamond pearl for pve
    Ruby diamond pearl obsidian for pvp
     
  3. iBrolis

    iBrolis User

    Joined:
    19.12.15
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    8
    Why Pearl for pve? Opal not better one for it?
     
  4. comma

    comma User

    Joined:
    01.07.14
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    18
  5. Riquinho

    Riquinho User

    Joined:
    04.07.16
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    1
    Hi, what is the chance to make a lvl 5?
     
  6. comma

    comma User

    Joined:
    01.07.14
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    18
  7. Takanodan

    Takanodan User

    Joined:
    22.08.13
    Messages:
    860
    Likes Received:
    357
    I'd go with opal for both pve and pvp..

    About chance for lv 5, I think it's 10% chance to go from lv 4 to lv 5, but not sure..
     
  8. Riquinho

    Riquinho User

    Joined:
    04.07.16
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    1
    Takanodan, you would have a link which shows the chance of each lvl or experiment conducted?

    I tested it with 100 box aquamarine and got only one lvl 4
     
  9. Takanodan

    Takanodan User

    Joined:
    22.08.13
    Messages:
    860
    Likes Received:
    357
    I don't know of any experiment.. I said I think might be 10% 'cause I made like 4 brooches lv 5 (3 sapphire) and I think should be around there.. but ofc it's not that reliable..
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.