1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Discord Support team Facebook l2central.info

dualswords or dualblunts?

Discussion in 'Archive 2.0' started by VaBybi, May 23, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. VaBybi

    VaBybi User

    Joined:
    02.12.15
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    25
    with red libra here , i want to change a wep for my iss.
    so... dualswords or dualblunts is better?
     
  2. SnoWyz

    SnoWyz User

    Joined:
    14.09.13
    Messages:
    3,829
    Likes Received:
    463
    1h weapon + sigil, if you're not swm or DM.
     
    VaBybi likes this.
  3. VaBybi

    VaBybi User

    Joined:
    02.12.15
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    25
    can explain why?

    and should i stay with heavy set or go for robe or light?
     
  4. cmec1

    cmec1 User

    Joined:
    03.08.15
    Messages:
    1,356
    Likes Received:
    125
    1h+sigil cause iss isnt a dd, and sigil gives staight pdef
    hvy if dont have pvp light+8, also if its box then cheap light+8 for reuses is good
     
    VaBybi likes this.
  5. St0ne

    St0ne User

    Joined:
    31.12.11
    Messages:
    1,053
    Likes Received:
    72
    Listein to cmec1 ,he is hlvl iss.
    I can add only that u should invest most items with HP/CON.
     
    VaBybi likes this.
  6. VaBybi

    VaBybi User

    Joined:
    02.12.15
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    25
    ok ty for info
     
  7. SnoWyz

    SnoWyz User

    Joined:
    14.09.13
    Messages:
    3,829
    Likes Received:
    463
    If you don't pvp high lvl, even a tw light set +8 can be your friend.
     
  8. VaBybi

    VaBybi User

    Joined:
    02.12.15
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    25
    i just will try to change my r99 +8 h +adena for light
     
  9. SnoWyz

    SnoWyz User

    Joined:
    14.09.13
    Messages:
    3,829
    Likes Received:
    463
    Good choice.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.